Skull Retrieval and Secondary Burial Practices in the Neolithic Near East: Recent Insights from Çatalhöyük, Turkey

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Skull Retrieval and Secondary Burial Practices in the Neolithic Near East: Recent Insights from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. / Haddow, Scott Donald; Knüsel, Christopher J.

In: Bioarchaeology International, Vol. 1, No. 1–2, 30.06.2017, p. 52-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Haddow, SD & Knüsel, CJ 2017, 'Skull Retrieval and Secondary Burial Practices in the Neolithic Near East: Recent Insights from Çatalhöyük, Turkey', Bioarchaeology International, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 52-71. https://doi.org/10.5744/bi.2017.1002

APA

Haddow, S. D., & Knüsel, C. J. (2017). Skull Retrieval and Secondary Burial Practices in the Neolithic Near East: Recent Insights from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Bioarchaeology International, 1(1–2), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.5744/bi.2017.1002

Vancouver

Haddow SD, Knüsel CJ. Skull Retrieval and Secondary Burial Practices in the Neolithic Near East: Recent Insights from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Bioarchaeology International. 2017 Jun 30;1(1–2):52-71. https://doi.org/10.5744/bi.2017.1002

Author

Haddow, Scott Donald ; Knüsel, Christopher J. / Skull Retrieval and Secondary Burial Practices in the Neolithic Near East: Recent Insights from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. In: Bioarchaeology International. 2017 ; Vol. 1, No. 1–2. pp. 52-71.

Bibtex

@article{3e3ce6484768488a9c70d0131d2d81bc,
title = "Skull Retrieval and Secondary Burial Practices in the Neolithic Near East: Recent Insights from {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k, Turkey",
abstract = "The retrieval and re-deposition of elements of the human skeleton, especially the skull (i.e., cranium and mandible), is a common feature of Neolithic Near Eastern funerary practices. A complicated sequence of subfloor inhumations involving both primary and secondary burial treatments at {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k demonstrates the range of funerary practices encountered at the site and elsewhere in the Neolithic Near East. This particular sequence of burials culminated in a stratigraphically verified case of post-inhumation skull removal from a primary intramural inhumation. However, the retrieval of crania and skulls from primary burials cannot account for the total number of re-deposited crania and skulls found in a variety of depositional contexts at the site. Based on increasing evidence for an extended interval between death and burial at {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k, the removal and circulation of skulls from unburied bodies as part of a multi-stage funerary rite is proposed as another method for obtaining them, operating in parallel with their retrieval from primary intramural burials. These divergent practices, and the range of contexts from which secondarily deposited skeletal elements are recovered, reflect multiple funerary treatments and intentions likely tied to social distinctions that remain poorly understood. In order to begin to fully understand the social and cosmological meaning(s) of the Neolithic “skull cult,” however, we must first distinguish between what are essentially equifinal processes in the archaeological record. This work will involve careful attention to the spatiotemporal contexts in which isolated skeletal elements are found, in addition to meticulous osteological and taphonomic analyses of the bones themselves.",
author = "Haddow, {Scott Donald} and Kn{\"u}sel, {Christopher J.}",
year = "2017",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.5744/bi.2017.1002",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "52--71",
journal = "Bioarchaeology International",
issn = "2472-8349",
publisher = "University of Florida Press",
number = "1–2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skull Retrieval and Secondary Burial Practices in the Neolithic Near East: Recent Insights from Çatalhöyük, Turkey

AU - Haddow, Scott Donald

AU - Knüsel, Christopher J.

PY - 2017/6/30

Y1 - 2017/6/30

N2 - The retrieval and re-deposition of elements of the human skeleton, especially the skull (i.e., cranium and mandible), is a common feature of Neolithic Near Eastern funerary practices. A complicated sequence of subfloor inhumations involving both primary and secondary burial treatments at Çatalhöyük demonstrates the range of funerary practices encountered at the site and elsewhere in the Neolithic Near East. This particular sequence of burials culminated in a stratigraphically verified case of post-inhumation skull removal from a primary intramural inhumation. However, the retrieval of crania and skulls from primary burials cannot account for the total number of re-deposited crania and skulls found in a variety of depositional contexts at the site. Based on increasing evidence for an extended interval between death and burial at Çatalhöyük, the removal and circulation of skulls from unburied bodies as part of a multi-stage funerary rite is proposed as another method for obtaining them, operating in parallel with their retrieval from primary intramural burials. These divergent practices, and the range of contexts from which secondarily deposited skeletal elements are recovered, reflect multiple funerary treatments and intentions likely tied to social distinctions that remain poorly understood. In order to begin to fully understand the social and cosmological meaning(s) of the Neolithic “skull cult,” however, we must first distinguish between what are essentially equifinal processes in the archaeological record. This work will involve careful attention to the spatiotemporal contexts in which isolated skeletal elements are found, in addition to meticulous osteological and taphonomic analyses of the bones themselves.

AB - The retrieval and re-deposition of elements of the human skeleton, especially the skull (i.e., cranium and mandible), is a common feature of Neolithic Near Eastern funerary practices. A complicated sequence of subfloor inhumations involving both primary and secondary burial treatments at Çatalhöyük demonstrates the range of funerary practices encountered at the site and elsewhere in the Neolithic Near East. This particular sequence of burials culminated in a stratigraphically verified case of post-inhumation skull removal from a primary intramural inhumation. However, the retrieval of crania and skulls from primary burials cannot account for the total number of re-deposited crania and skulls found in a variety of depositional contexts at the site. Based on increasing evidence for an extended interval between death and burial at Çatalhöyük, the removal and circulation of skulls from unburied bodies as part of a multi-stage funerary rite is proposed as another method for obtaining them, operating in parallel with their retrieval from primary intramural burials. These divergent practices, and the range of contexts from which secondarily deposited skeletal elements are recovered, reflect multiple funerary treatments and intentions likely tied to social distinctions that remain poorly understood. In order to begin to fully understand the social and cosmological meaning(s) of the Neolithic “skull cult,” however, we must first distinguish between what are essentially equifinal processes in the archaeological record. This work will involve careful attention to the spatiotemporal contexts in which isolated skeletal elements are found, in addition to meticulous osteological and taphonomic analyses of the bones themselves.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/skull-retrieval-secondary-burial-practices-neolithic-near-east-recent-insights-%C3%A7atalh%C3%B6y%C3%BCk-turkey

U2 - 10.5744/bi.2017.1002

DO - 10.5744/bi.2017.1002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1

SP - 52

EP - 71

JO - Bioarchaeology International

JF - Bioarchaeology International

SN - 2472-8349

IS - 1–2

ER -

ID: 231859606