Landscapes of Little Lhasa: Materialities of the Vernacular, Political and Commercial in Urban China

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Landscapes of Little Lhasa : Materialities of the Vernacular, Political and Commercial in Urban China. / Brox, Trine.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 107, No. December, 02.11.2019, p. 24-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Brox, T 2019, 'Landscapes of Little Lhasa: Materialities of the Vernacular, Political and Commercial in Urban China', Geoforum, vol. 107, no. December, pp. 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.017

APA

Brox, T. (2019). Landscapes of Little Lhasa: Materialities of the Vernacular, Political and Commercial in Urban China. Geoforum, 107(December), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.017

Vancouver

Brox T. Landscapes of Little Lhasa: Materialities of the Vernacular, Political and Commercial in Urban China. Geoforum. 2019 Nov 2;107(December):24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.017

Author

Brox, Trine. / Landscapes of Little Lhasa : Materialities of the Vernacular, Political and Commercial in Urban China. In: Geoforum. 2019 ; Vol. 107, No. December. pp. 24-33.

Bibtex

@article{2d634ca3a50542ff8b187501be9e5ebc,
title = "Landscapes of Little Lhasa: Materialities of the Vernacular, Political and Commercial in Urban China",
abstract = "This article problematizes the juxtaposition of place and identity. By analyzing different dimensions of landscape, it asks how an ethnically diverse neighborhood in Chengdu, China, has become considered a Tibetan place. The article engages with and pushes John Brinckerhoff Jackson{\textquoteright}s distinction between political and vernacular landscapes, introducing a third category: the commercial landscape. Each of these three dimensions of the landscape, which are deeply entangled but conceptually distinct, transforms multi-ethnic space into a Tibetan place. The vernacular emerges from the traces of quotidian life in the form of languages, bodily practices, sights, scents, and colors: it {\textquoteleft}feels{\textquoteright} Tibetan. The political relates to the securitization of Tibetan spaces and how people re-imagine the traces of state-led spatial management and organization. Finally, the commercial has to do with the appropriation of Tibetan aesthetics in the pursuit of profiting from a Tibetan Buddhist identity. I argue that these three different landscapes are what enable us to recognize a multi-ethnic space as a Tibetan place. ",
author = "Trine Brox",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.017",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "24--33",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "December",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Landscapes of Little Lhasa

T2 - Materialities of the Vernacular, Political and Commercial in Urban China

AU - Brox, Trine

PY - 2019/11/2

Y1 - 2019/11/2

N2 - This article problematizes the juxtaposition of place and identity. By analyzing different dimensions of landscape, it asks how an ethnically diverse neighborhood in Chengdu, China, has become considered a Tibetan place. The article engages with and pushes John Brinckerhoff Jackson’s distinction between political and vernacular landscapes, introducing a third category: the commercial landscape. Each of these three dimensions of the landscape, which are deeply entangled but conceptually distinct, transforms multi-ethnic space into a Tibetan place. The vernacular emerges from the traces of quotidian life in the form of languages, bodily practices, sights, scents, and colors: it ‘feels’ Tibetan. The political relates to the securitization of Tibetan spaces and how people re-imagine the traces of state-led spatial management and organization. Finally, the commercial has to do with the appropriation of Tibetan aesthetics in the pursuit of profiting from a Tibetan Buddhist identity. I argue that these three different landscapes are what enable us to recognize a multi-ethnic space as a Tibetan place.

AB - This article problematizes the juxtaposition of place and identity. By analyzing different dimensions of landscape, it asks how an ethnically diverse neighborhood in Chengdu, China, has become considered a Tibetan place. The article engages with and pushes John Brinckerhoff Jackson’s distinction between political and vernacular landscapes, introducing a third category: the commercial landscape. Each of these three dimensions of the landscape, which are deeply entangled but conceptually distinct, transforms multi-ethnic space into a Tibetan place. The vernacular emerges from the traces of quotidian life in the form of languages, bodily practices, sights, scents, and colors: it ‘feels’ Tibetan. The political relates to the securitization of Tibetan spaces and how people re-imagine the traces of state-led spatial management and organization. Finally, the commercial has to do with the appropriation of Tibetan aesthetics in the pursuit of profiting from a Tibetan Buddhist identity. I argue that these three different landscapes are what enable us to recognize a multi-ethnic space as a Tibetan place.

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.017

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.017

M3 - Journal article

VL - 107

SP - 24

EP - 33

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

IS - December

ER -

ID: 229730696