Regimeideologi og politisk historiebrug i Rusland: Udstillingen »Rusland – Min Historie«

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Regimeideologi og politisk historiebrug i Rusland : Udstillingen »Rusland – Min Historie«. / Suslov, Mikhail.

In: Nordisk Oestforum, Vol. 35, 2021, p. 236-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Suslov, M 2021, 'Regimeideologi og politisk historiebrug i Rusland: Udstillingen »Rusland – Min Historie«', Nordisk Oestforum, vol. 35, pp. 236-256. https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v35.3166

APA

Suslov, M. (2021). Regimeideologi og politisk historiebrug i Rusland: Udstillingen »Rusland – Min Historie«. Nordisk Oestforum, 35, 236-256. https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v35.3166

Vancouver

Suslov M. Regimeideologi og politisk historiebrug i Rusland: Udstillingen »Rusland – Min Historie«. Nordisk Oestforum. 2021;35:236-256. https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v35.3166

Author

Suslov, Mikhail. / Regimeideologi og politisk historiebrug i Rusland : Udstillingen »Rusland – Min Historie«. In: Nordisk Oestforum. 2021 ; Vol. 35. pp. 236-256.

Bibtex

@article{7cc13d2ae1b14f62a56827d84c5a87f7,
title = "Regimeideologi og politisk historiebrug i Rusland: Udstillingen »Rusland – Min Historie«",
abstract = "The article analyses representations of history in today{\textquoteright}s Russia as part of the ideology for expressing central political concepts underlying the Putinist regime. Mainstream interpretations of history build on a populist vision of Russia as a community with a stable, unchangeable core of identity. In this ideological context, history serves as the canvas on which the {\textquoteleft}authentic{\textquoteright} Russian identity manifests itself. The present research article examines representations of history by focusing on the concepts of {\textquoteleft}historical sovereignty{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}unity of history{\textquoteright}, and the role of elites in history. It finds that regime ideology in today{\textquoteright}s Russia relies on a sizable infrastructure that involves producing historical knowledge for the purpose of securitizing history and making it an instrumental element in the populist (conservative-communitarian) ideology. Sources for this study come from the network exhibition {\textquoteleft}Russia – My History{\textquoteright}, contextualized through content analysis of the key producers of ideology in Putin{\textquoteright}s Russia.",
author = "Mikhail Suslov",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.23865/noros.v35.3166",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "35",
pages = "236--256",
journal = "Nordisk Oestforum",
issn = "0801-7220",
publisher = "Universitetsforlaget AS",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regimeideologi og politisk historiebrug i Rusland

T2 - Udstillingen »Rusland – Min Historie«

AU - Suslov, Mikhail

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The article analyses representations of history in today’s Russia as part of the ideology for expressing central political concepts underlying the Putinist regime. Mainstream interpretations of history build on a populist vision of Russia as a community with a stable, unchangeable core of identity. In this ideological context, history serves as the canvas on which the ‘authentic’ Russian identity manifests itself. The present research article examines representations of history by focusing on the concepts of ‘historical sovereignty’, ‘unity of history’, and the role of elites in history. It finds that regime ideology in today’s Russia relies on a sizable infrastructure that involves producing historical knowledge for the purpose of securitizing history and making it an instrumental element in the populist (conservative-communitarian) ideology. Sources for this study come from the network exhibition ‘Russia – My History’, contextualized through content analysis of the key producers of ideology in Putin’s Russia.

AB - The article analyses representations of history in today’s Russia as part of the ideology for expressing central political concepts underlying the Putinist regime. Mainstream interpretations of history build on a populist vision of Russia as a community with a stable, unchangeable core of identity. In this ideological context, history serves as the canvas on which the ‘authentic’ Russian identity manifests itself. The present research article examines representations of history by focusing on the concepts of ‘historical sovereignty’, ‘unity of history’, and the role of elites in history. It finds that regime ideology in today’s Russia relies on a sizable infrastructure that involves producing historical knowledge for the purpose of securitizing history and making it an instrumental element in the populist (conservative-communitarian) ideology. Sources for this study come from the network exhibition ‘Russia – My History’, contextualized through content analysis of the key producers of ideology in Putin’s Russia.

U2 - 10.23865/noros.v35.3166

DO - 10.23865/noros.v35.3166

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 35

SP - 236

EP - 256

JO - Nordisk Oestforum

JF - Nordisk Oestforum

SN - 0801-7220

ER -

ID: 287121364