Thermal alterations to human remains in Çatalhöyük

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Thermal alterations to human remains in Çatalhöyük. / Skipper, Cassie E.; Haddow, Scott D.; Pilloud, Marin A.

In: Near Eastern Archaeology, Vol. 83, No. 2, 01.06.2020, p. 120-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Skipper, CE, Haddow, SD & Pilloud, MA 2020, 'Thermal alterations to human remains in Çatalhöyük', Near Eastern Archaeology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1086/708888

APA

Skipper, C. E., Haddow, S. D., & Pilloud, M. A. (2020). Thermal alterations to human remains in Çatalhöyük. Near Eastern Archaeology, 83(2), 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1086/708888

Vancouver

Skipper CE, Haddow SD, Pilloud MA. Thermal alterations to human remains in Çatalhöyük. Near Eastern Archaeology. 2020 Jun 1;83(2):120-128. https://doi.org/10.1086/708888

Author

Skipper, Cassie E. ; Haddow, Scott D. ; Pilloud, Marin A. / Thermal alterations to human remains in Çatalhöyük. In: Near Eastern Archaeology. 2020 ; Vol. 83, No. 2. pp. 120-128.

Bibtex

@article{8353cbfffb9747ca82976adeb3e45376,
title = "Thermal alterations to human remains in {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k",
abstract = "The Neolithic East Mound at {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k, dating to 7100–5950 cal BCE (Bayliss et al. 2015), in central Anatolia is well known as a large, early agricultural village. Like other Neolithic sites in this region, the site had distinct mortuary practices, which at {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k are dominated by primary interments beneath house floors, accounting for 83 percent of stratified individuals recovered to date (Haddow et al. in press). While commingling of skeletal elements due to repeated use of house platforms as burial locations is common (Boz and Hager 2013; Haddow, Sadvari et al. 2016), there is also evidence of secondary burial practices including post-interment cranial retrieval and the occurrence of loose and partially articulated skeletal elements moved from a previous location (Haddow and Kn{\"u}sel 2017). Such observations suggest the practice of delayed burial for certain individuals, a pattern that appears to increase in frequency over time (Haddow et al. in press).",
author = "Skipper, {Cassie E.} and Haddow, {Scott D.} and Pilloud, {Marin A.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/708888",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "120--128",
journal = "Near Eastern Archaeology",
issn = "1094-2076",
publisher = "The American Schools of Oriental Research",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thermal alterations to human remains in Çatalhöyük

AU - Skipper, Cassie E.

AU - Haddow, Scott D.

AU - Pilloud, Marin A.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/6/1

Y1 - 2020/6/1

N2 - The Neolithic East Mound at Çatalhöyük, dating to 7100–5950 cal BCE (Bayliss et al. 2015), in central Anatolia is well known as a large, early agricultural village. Like other Neolithic sites in this region, the site had distinct mortuary practices, which at Çatalhöyük are dominated by primary interments beneath house floors, accounting for 83 percent of stratified individuals recovered to date (Haddow et al. in press). While commingling of skeletal elements due to repeated use of house platforms as burial locations is common (Boz and Hager 2013; Haddow, Sadvari et al. 2016), there is also evidence of secondary burial practices including post-interment cranial retrieval and the occurrence of loose and partially articulated skeletal elements moved from a previous location (Haddow and Knüsel 2017). Such observations suggest the practice of delayed burial for certain individuals, a pattern that appears to increase in frequency over time (Haddow et al. in press).

AB - The Neolithic East Mound at Çatalhöyük, dating to 7100–5950 cal BCE (Bayliss et al. 2015), in central Anatolia is well known as a large, early agricultural village. Like other Neolithic sites in this region, the site had distinct mortuary practices, which at Çatalhöyük are dominated by primary interments beneath house floors, accounting for 83 percent of stratified individuals recovered to date (Haddow et al. in press). While commingling of skeletal elements due to repeated use of house platforms as burial locations is common (Boz and Hager 2013; Haddow, Sadvari et al. 2016), there is also evidence of secondary burial practices including post-interment cranial retrieval and the occurrence of loose and partially articulated skeletal elements moved from a previous location (Haddow and Knüsel 2017). Such observations suggest the practice of delayed burial for certain individuals, a pattern that appears to increase in frequency over time (Haddow et al. in press).

U2 - 10.1086/708888

DO - 10.1086/708888

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85085992881

VL - 83

SP - 120

EP - 128

JO - Near Eastern Archaeology

JF - Near Eastern Archaeology

SN - 1094-2076

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 279270355