Narrative Absence: An 'Untouchable Account of Partition Migration
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Narrative Absence: An 'Untouchable Account of Partition Migration. / Kaur, Ravinder.
In: Contributions to Indian Sociology, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2008, p. 281-306.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Narrative Absence: An 'Untouchable Account of Partition Migration
AU - Kaur, Ravinder
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - The core of symbolic communities, like the community of Partition migrants, is formed through the discursive ownership of historical experiences—for instance, the loss of human lives, personal property and dismemberment of national territory; followed by the restoration of that loss through examples of successful refugee resettlement and national self-assertion. Within the master narrative of Partition migration history, however, the experiences of forced movement and resettlement suffered by the ‘Untouchables’ are obscured. Popular accounts of violence, forced movement and suffering are largely built around the narratives produced by upper caste and upper middle-class migrants and exclude the experiences of Untouchable migrants. This narrative absence becomes a gauge of both the discursive and physical exclusion of ‘Untouchable'refugees from the legitimate community of Partition migrants. Such a meta-version of Partition history constitutes the realm of the normal, outside which ‘Untouchable’ narratives exist as an aberration in the theme of modern citizen-making in post-colonial India. In this article, I examine these ‘aberrations’ to provide an alternate reading that helps us challenge the master narrative of Partition migration history.
AB - The core of symbolic communities, like the community of Partition migrants, is formed through the discursive ownership of historical experiences—for instance, the loss of human lives, personal property and dismemberment of national territory; followed by the restoration of that loss through examples of successful refugee resettlement and national self-assertion. Within the master narrative of Partition migration history, however, the experiences of forced movement and resettlement suffered by the ‘Untouchables’ are obscured. Popular accounts of violence, forced movement and suffering are largely built around the narratives produced by upper caste and upper middle-class migrants and exclude the experiences of Untouchable migrants. This narrative absence becomes a gauge of both the discursive and physical exclusion of ‘Untouchable'refugees from the legitimate community of Partition migrants. Such a meta-version of Partition history constitutes the realm of the normal, outside which ‘Untouchable’ narratives exist as an aberration in the theme of modern citizen-making in post-colonial India. In this article, I examine these ‘aberrations’ to provide an alternate reading that helps us challenge the master narrative of Partition migration history.
U2 - 10.1177/006996670804200204
DO - 10.1177/006996670804200204
M3 - Journal article
VL - 42
SP - 281
EP - 306
JO - Contributions to Indian Sociology
JF - Contributions to Indian Sociology
SN - 0069-9667
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 32470467