Theorizing Gender in the Face of Social Change: Is There Anything Essential About Essentialism?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Theorizing Gender in the Face of Social Change : Is There Anything Essential About Essentialism? / Morton, Thomas A.; Postmes, Tom; Haslam, S. Alexander; Hornsey, Matthew J.
In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 3, 01.03.2009, p. 653-664.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Theorizing Gender in the Face of Social Change
T2 - Is There Anything Essential About Essentialism?
AU - Morton, Thomas A.
AU - Postmes, Tom
AU - Haslam, S. Alexander
AU - Hornsey, Matthew J.
PY - 2009/3/1
Y1 - 2009/3/1
N2 - The authors examine how beliefs about the stability of the social hierarchy moderate the link between sexism and essentialist beliefs about gender and how the expression of essentialist beliefs might reciprocally affect the social structure. Studies 1 (N = 240) and 2 (N = 143) presented gender-based inequality as stable, changing, or changed. In both studies, sexism was positively associated with essentialism only among men and only when inequality was presented as changing. Study 3 (N = 552) explored the possible consequences of expressing essentialist theories for social change. Exposure to essentialist theories increased both men's and women's acceptance of inequality. Exposure further increased men's support for discriminatory practices and boosted their self-esteem. These patterns demonstrate that although essentialism is linked to prejudice, this link is itself not essential. Rather, essentialism may be invoked strategically to protect higher status when this is threatened by change and may be successful in so doing.
AB - The authors examine how beliefs about the stability of the social hierarchy moderate the link between sexism and essentialist beliefs about gender and how the expression of essentialist beliefs might reciprocally affect the social structure. Studies 1 (N = 240) and 2 (N = 143) presented gender-based inequality as stable, changing, or changed. In both studies, sexism was positively associated with essentialism only among men and only when inequality was presented as changing. Study 3 (N = 552) explored the possible consequences of expressing essentialist theories for social change. Exposure to essentialist theories increased both men's and women's acceptance of inequality. Exposure further increased men's support for discriminatory practices and boosted their self-esteem. These patterns demonstrate that although essentialism is linked to prejudice, this link is itself not essential. Rather, essentialism may be invoked strategically to protect higher status when this is threatened by change and may be successful in so doing.
KW - discrimination
KW - essentialism
KW - sexism
KW - social change
KW - social stability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62649098325&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/a0012966
DO - 10.1037/a0012966
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19254110
AN - SCOPUS:62649098325
VL - 96
SP - 653
EP - 664
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
SN - 0022-3514
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 214452559